Author Archives: bmayton

Lenovo Bluetooth Keyboard Repairs

For one of my home desktop setups, I have very particular keyboard requirements.  Since I put the keyboard in my lap (there’s no desk/table, the monitor is suspended on a cantilevered arm) the pointing device needs to be integrated into the keyboard itself.  I’ve become less of a fan of trackpads over the years, especially the terrible ones that are integrated into cheap wireless keyboard combos like the ubiquitous Logitech K400.  Furthermore, as it’s a Linux machine and I’m very accustomed to the X11 clipboard, which uses the middle mouse button to paste, I want a physical middle button.  I’ve only found one wireless keyboard that meets those requirements, and it’s Lenovo’s bluetooth keyboard with a TrackPoint:

Bluetooth keyboard

I like the keyboards and TrackPoints on my ThinkPads, so it’s nice to have the same setup.  Unfortunately, the wireless keyboard is a bit of a regression from the ones on my ThinkPads: it lacks the row above the function keys, the function keys have tiny markings with big icons for their secondary functions (which I don’t care about) and the build quality is overall not as good as older ThinkPads.  I also don’t like Bluetooth (pairing is complicated, and it doesn’t work in the bootloader/BIOS).  But, it works.  Well, it did, at least until my TrackPoint stopped working one day.  The keyboard continued to work, but the TrackPoint started drifting incessantly to the upper left no matter how it was deflected, followed by ceasing to work altogether (including the buttons) a couple of days later.

Searching for others with the same issue led me to this surprisingly recent and relevant GitHub issue.  I suspected it might be an issue with the keyboard’s firmware, that it had gotten into some state where it had disabled the TrackPoint (most ThinkPads with the Windows drivers had a hotkey to disable the TrackPoint; did the wireless keyboard perhaps have a similar, but undocumented function?)  Attempts to reset the keyboard (disconnecting the battery, holding different keys on powerup) didn’t bring it back, though.  I did discover a few things that would cause it to lose its Bluetooth pairing, suggesting a reset of some sort (holding the Esc key when connecting the battery seems to do this), the TrackPoint still didn’t come back.

Removing the circuit board and inspecting the traces on both sides led to more insight about how the keyboard works.  In all ThinkPads I’ve seen (up through my T420s, at least) the TrackPoint controller is on a small PCB physically attached to the TrackPoint itself on the back of the keyboard.  The TrackPoint is a couple of strain gages; the controller reads the strain gages, does some dynamic calibration, and translates the result into cursor movement, which is communicated to the computer over PS/2.  The wireless keyboard is missing the controller on the TrackPoint itself.  Instead, a 4-conductor flex cable goes back to the main board.

pcb_2

The main board has two microcontrollers on it.  Most of the functionality appears to be handled by a BCM20730 SoC, which is intended for implementing Bluetooth HID devices.  This chip sits on a module mounted to the mainboard with castellated vias along the edge.  It has a built-in trace antenna, though for whatever reason the keyboard designers have chosen to use an external antenna on the mainboard instead.  The UART pins on the module are wired to test points on the bottom of the board with their functions labeled; these points are accessible without disassembling the keyboard by removing the label from the bottom.  This is probably how the keyboard’s firmware is initially programmed.

The signals from the keyboard matrix connector all route to this module, with the exception of the mouse buttons, so the module seems to be handling the keyboard functionality directly.  The second chip, on the mainboard itself, appears to connect to the module through I²C (judging by the labels on the test points on the bottom of the board) though I didn’t actually probe the signals to confirm this.  This IC, which is labeled 502A6 HF372 7AV1 in my unit, isn’t something I’ve been able to identify.  I suspect it might be an ASIC based on the lack of any programming interface.  Otherwise, it would have to be preprogrammed before being installed on the board.

This second IC appears to be the TrackPoint controller, and on my keyboard appeared to be poorly soldered.  I was unable to visually confirm good connections between most of the pads.  Removing the chip with hot air didn’t change my keyboard’s behavior—the keyboard continued to pair and work perfectly, while the TrackPoint was dead.  This confirmed that this IC is not used for the keyboard functionality and must just be the TrackPoint controller.

Inspecting the bottom side of the chip under a microscope (I unfortunately did not take pictures) made me extremely doubtful that some of the pads had ever had solder on them; they appeared dull and oxidized.  I cleaned off the PCB and the chip with solder wick, and re-soldered the chip using leaded solder.  When I connected everything again, I once again had a working TrackPoint.  I can’t say I’m impressed with the quality control for an $80 keyboard.

Repair Guide

To help others who are having the same or similar problems, I’ve put together some instructions for performing the fix.  This isn’t really an exhaustive guide and requires some expertise, but hopefully will be useful to someone.

There are only three screws in the entire assembly, and they hold the TrackPoint on to the bottom of the keyboard.  Everything else is just press-fit or stuck together.  The top frame just pops off.  I started in the bottom left corner, and didn’t need any tools other than my figners to start removing it.  (If yours is tight, a plastic spudger might help).

Opening the case

Continue to work around the outside until the frame is freed from the bottom all the way around.

Starting to open the case

Once the frame is off, peel the keyboard up from the base.  It’s just stuck down using double-sided tape.  Make sure to pry underneath the metal backing and not the plastic bezel.  Be aware that there are two cables attached to the bottom of the keyboard: one for the keys and buttons, and another for the TrackPoint.  The keyboard cable is fairly large and robust and has some extra length, but the TrackPoint cable is thin and fragile.  I suggest releasing this from its connector as soon as you can to reduce the risk of damaging it:

trackpoint_cable

The adhesive can be reluctant to let go, but just be patient and apply gentle, continuous force as it comes free.  Just be careful not to tear the cables or bend the keyboard.

keyboard_inside

With the keyboard disconnected and removed, this is what’s left inside the case.  There’s the battery, the main board, a small PCB with the LED and switch, and the NFC pairing board along the front edge.  Make sure to disconnect the battery connector before doing any work on the PCB so you don’t short anything.

pcb_2

The chip we’re interested in is U2, at the upper left corner of the main board right next to the TrackPoint connector.  At this point, there are two options.  The first is to remove the chip with hot air, clean the chip and PCB, apply the proper amount of solder paste, and reflow.  However, if you don’t have all of the equipment for that, repairs might be possible with an iron with a relatively fine tip and a good flux.  Apply the flux (I recommend this stuff, it is expensive but fantastic) so that it coats both the pads on the board and the side of the chip.  Put a small blob of solder on your iron tip, and run it along the side of the chip.  The idea is that you want the blob to touch both the pads and the side of the chip, but the tip itself shouldn’t physically drag across either (the pads on the board are very easily scraped off, especially several without traces connected to them).  If you’re doing this correctly, the perfect amount of solder should be left on the pad and the chip without leaving bridges between adjacent pads.  If you do end up with bridges, add more flux and try again.  Note that the tip doesn’t need to be particularly fine, as long as it’s not so big that you can’t avoid the passive components nearby.

Given my initial assessment of the board, I am doubtful that simply heating the chip without additional flux and solder would fix the problem (lead-free solder really does not flow nicely).  However, if you have a hot air gun it might be worth trying before attempting the above.  I would still add some flux, and possibly apply some gentle pressure to the top of the chip while heating, though be careful not to slide it around on the board.

A properly soldered chip should look something like this:

chip_solder

Note how you can see nice fillets that go between the pad on the board and the exposed copper on the side of the chip.  There might be connections underneath even if you can’t see these fillets on the side of the chip, but seeing them gives you a nice confirmation that you have a good mechanical and electrical connection.

If things are working again, the reassembly procedure is basically the reverse of disassembly.  Make sure that the cables that go between the boards are routed through their proper channels, reconnect the keyboard matrix and trackpoint cables, and stick the keyboard back down (there are a few features in the plastic that help you align it).  Stick it down lightly and then apply pressure from the middle outward—this will help ensure that it stays centered and even.

I’d be interested in hearing if this helped fix your broken TrackPoint, or if you have any suggestions to improve this article.

ADAT modification for the Layla converters

Background and Motivation

Since this project involves a bunch of digital audio stuff that some of my readers might not be familiar with, I’ll start by describing my motivation for the project and some of the background information about the protocols and hardware involved.  If you’re already familiar with this stuff and just want to see the hack, jump to the next section.

I have a somewhat unusual audio setup at home.  I use a DAW (digital audio workstation) software on my desktop computer as a digital mixer for all of the sound coming from it.  Using JACK on Linux, I route the output of each program to a different mixer channel, so in addition to having different volume settings for each program, I can apply effects as well (such as equalization or applying a little bit of compression when watching a movie late at night, so the loud parts aren’t quite so loud.)  I can then route the audio between multiple outputs, primarily my studio monitors and my headphone amplifier.

The sound card I use is an RME Digi9652.  These are older PCI cards, which are now inexpensively available second-hand since newer computers have mostly PCI-e slots instead.  But, the card still works on my motherboard, has great Linux support, and provides 26 inputs and 26 outputs with very low latency.  Like many multichannel audio cards, all of the I/O is digital.  The 9652 has three pairs of ADAT Lightpipe ports and one pair of coaxial S/PDIF connectors.  In order to get analog audio in and out, it requires the use of external converters connected to the ADAT ports.

ADAT Lightpipe is a protocol developed by Alesis in the early 90s for their digital multitrack tape recorders (the Alesis Digital Audio Tape, or ADAT).  It uses the same plastic fiber optic cables and connectors as consumer TOSLINK connections, but carries 8 channels of audio rather than a stereo pair.  The ADAT tape deck is now pretty much obsolete as most digital audio recording is now done with computers or hard-disk based recorders, but the optical interface is still around, often just called “ADAT” now.  The relatively low complexity of its implementation and inexpensive LED transceivers has established it as the de facto standard for connecting low channel count digital audio devices together.

Previously in my home setup, I wasn’t using any of the inputs, and ran 4 channels of output—two to my headphone amplifier and two to my monitors.  I was using another board that I built (which I might write about later) to take one of the ADAT outputs and split it into multiple 2-channel S/PDIF outputs, one of which went to a Benchmark DAC1 driving my headphone amplifier and the other to my AMB γ2 driving the monitors.

I wanted, however, to be able to include some of my other audio devices in the same setup as well.  One of these devices is my Netflix player; I run Linux on my desktop which Netflix doesn’t support, so it’s easier just to use hardware where it’s supported.  Basically, I wanted a few analog inputs that I could plug other devices like this into in order to get their audio into my mixer, so it could be processed and routed like the audio coming from software running on my computer.

The Hack

The off-the-shelf solution to my problem would have been to just buy an 8-channel A/D and D/A converter box with ADAT I/O.  These tend to start somewhere around $500 for a cheap one, though, and I didn’t want to spend that much.  They also tend to hold more of their value second-hand, as ADAT is still widely used, so it’s harder to find cheap used ones.  But, there was something interesting in my junk pile that ended up being the solution.

layla

This thing is the converter box for an audio interface that Echo made in the late 90s, called the Layla.   There were two other audio interfaces in the Event series, named Darla and Gina, with fewer channels—the Layla was the top of the series with 10 analog outputs and 8 analog inputs.  It connected to the computer by a 25-pin proprietary umbilical cable to a PCI card.  I came across this interface box being thrown away, with the PCI card long gone.  By itself, it’s practically worthless, as the 25-pin interface is not at all standard.  I originally grabbed it intending to salvage some of the parts out of it and maybe re-use the case (empty rackmount cases are expensive!)

But my current need for audio I/O had me looking at it again.  I decided to replace the DB-25 connector with an ADAT interface, which would let me connect it to my RME card.  I’ll jump to the end result and show it working before I go into detail on how it was done:

back_plugged

That black plate in the middle is the only indication that it’s been modified.  It covers up the spot where the original DB-25 connector was, and replaces it with a pair of optical connectors and a mini USB port for configuration.  On the left side are the analog inputs and outputs; these are all functional except for outputs 9 and 10 (as ADAT only carries 8 channels).  The wordclock I/O is also functional, though the S/PDIF and MIDI are not.

To accomplish this, I essentially re-used the whole analog section and the converters themselves, while re-wiring and replacing most of the digital electronics.

Inside

interior

Inside the Layla box (ignore the modifications for now) the analog inputs are the section on the left, and the outputs are immediately to the right of the inputs.  Both directions use Crystal Semiconductor (now Cirrus Logic) converter chips, with two channels of audio handled by each chip.  On the input side, there’s an MC33079 op amp acting as a balanced line receiver, a CS3310 digital volume control IC, and another op amp buffering the inputs to the CS5335 analog-to digital converters.  The CS3310s are controlled over a serial (SPI) bus, and allow the input gain to be set anywhere from -95.5dB up to +31.5dB, in 0.5dB increments.

On the outputs, the CS4327 converters feed into more MC33079 op amps that act as the balanced line drivers.  Each pair of channels also has a quad CMOS switch, with two switches allocated to each channel.  One disconnects the converters from the line drivers, acting as a hardware mute.  The other switches an extra resistor into the feedback loop of the op amps, dropping the output levels from +4dBu to -10dBV.

To the right of the outputs is the power supply, which creates the ±15V analog voltage supply rails for the op amps, and the +5V analog/digital supply for the converters and digital volume controls.  The big red, black, and yellow wires are actually how it came from the factory—originally, Echo intended to power the interface box from the PCI card (you can see where the 25-pin connector used to be below the power supply, by the way) but they ended up adding the dedicated power supply stuck on to the right side of the board after being unsatisfied with the performance of the device when it was running on noisy computer power at the end of a long cable that also carried high-speed digital signals. [1]

To the right of the power supply, there used to be an FPGA that coordinated all of the converters and sent the data back over the 25-pin cable.  In the picture above, I’ve removed the original FPGA completely.

The modification consists of two main parts: the ADAT interface itself, and a microcontroller to manage the digital controls like the input and output gains.

ADAT Interface

adat_board

ADAT Lightpipe was covered by a few patents that Alesis owned, which meant paying license fees to include it as an interface.  As a result, there aren’t a lot of off-the-shelf chips that handle ADAT.  (This is now changing—best I can tell (though I am not a lawyer) the patents have recently expired, and implementations of the ADAT protocol are now showing up as IP blocks that can run on FPGAs and some microcontrollers.)  For this project, I’ve used the Wavefront chipset.  Wavefront Semiconductor manufactured a couple of Alesis’s custom chips, including the AL1401AG and AL1402G ADAT interface chips.  These are presumably the chips that were inside the actual ADAT decks (though I’ve never taken one apart to confirm that).

The AL1402G takes an ADAT bitstream and decodes it into 4 channels of serial digital audio, with each data line containing interleaved data for two audio channels.  It also recovers a system clock (256*Fs, where Fs is the sample rate), a bit clock (64*Fs) which indicates when the individual bits of audio data should be latched, and word clock (Fs).  The AL1401AG takes the serial audio signals and wordclock and goes the other direction, producing an ADAT bitstream.

digital_audio

To add the ADAT chipset, I started by gluing a 20-pin header to an open space on the board.  I glue the headers down first with superglue, and add some 2-part epoxy later to really make sure that they stay put.  This provides a point from which signals on the board can be wired into an additional PCB that can be easily disconnected for servicing.

The signals are then wired up using 30-gauge wire-wrapping wire.  I’ve roughly color-coded data lines as yellow, clocks as white, power as red, and ground as blue.  The various signals were located by referencing the datasheets for the converter chips and looking for continuity between the pins on the chip and easier places to solder to.  The A/D converters have resistors on most of their signals, which have nice big pads to which to solder wires.  The D/As didn’t have the resistors on the data lines, so I’ve scraped away a bit of the soldermask on the traces and soldered the wires to the exposed copper.  The clock lines are shared between all of the converters on the board, so the clock signals just connect in one location and then run through the traces on the PCB to everything else.  I did cut off the part of the traces where they used to run to the FPGA to keep them from acting as big antennas.

There are a couple of different formats for serial digital audio—they all use a system clock, bit clock, and word clock (sometimes also called LR clock because its value toggles between the left and right channels) and all will generally have 32 bits of data transmitted for each channel.  Most audio converters are either 16, 20, or 24-bits, however, so there’s variation on which of those 32 bits are used to transmit the actual data.  The two most common are left-justified (where, for a 24-bit converter, the first 24 bits are used and the last 8 are ignored) and I²S, which is like left-justified but the first bit of the channel comes one bit clock cycle after the word clock changes, rather than at the same time.  Right-justified formats are also sometimes used as well.  To account for all of these different formats, most chips that have a serial digital audio interface have a couple of pins that can be set high or low to configure which format should be used.  This is true of both the converters in the Layla and the Wavefront chips.  Unfortunately, the Layla PCB is hardwired to configure the converters to use I²S, which is a format that the Wavefront chips don’t support.  This required lifting the configuration pins off of their pads on the PCB and running short wires to connect them to either power or ground.  With the D/A converters, it was only necessary to change one of the configuration pins, which you can see as the short blue wires next to the chips.  On the A/D side, both configuration pins needed to change, so there’s both a red and a blue wire.  Wiring-wise, this was the most tedious part of the modification.

The actual board that carries the ADAT chipset is made from a single-sided PCB, with the spaces between traces milled out with a 1/64″ endmill.  A 20-pin through-hole connector on the back side of the board mates with the 20-pin header epoxied to the original board.  The ADAT transceivers connect via the 6-pin header on the top side of the board, which will be discussed later in this article.

Next to the ADAT board, you can also see an additional 7805 regulator that I’ve added to the main PCB.  The existing 5-volt supply is already pretty heavily loaded by the converters themselves, and since it’s also used by the analog side of the converters, I didn’t want to put too much more digital circuitry on it.  The additional 7805 is a separate supply that runs the circuitry I’ve added.  The tab is soldered to a pad for an electrolytic capacitor that was unpopulated on the original board.

The Controller

control

The original Layla came with software that allowed the user to adjust the input and output gains.  This was mediated by the FPGA, which I removed.  To be able to control these signals, I added another 20-pin header and PCB that controls these signals.  I used an ATmega32U2 microcontroller, which has just enough I/O pins for the task.  The 32U2 also has a USB interface, with which I provide a way for the settings to be changed from a computer.

All of the digital control lines conveniently come out to resistor packs near where the FPGA used to be.  There are 4 chip select lines for the 4 digital volume ICs, as well as shared clock and data lines for their SPI bus.  Then there are 9 digital lines that go to the CMOS switches on the output—8 switch the individual outputs between +4dBu and -10dBV levels, and the ninth is the mute signal, which applies to all channels at once.  The controller board connects to these lines via the epoxied header, and the USB port on the back panel connects through another 6-pin header on the top side of the board.

The USB port, when connected, shows up as a vendor-specific USB device, for which I’ve written a small command-line tool in Python that allows changing the gains.  The actual gain settings are stored in the microcontroller’s EEPROM, so they are retained across power cycles.

The error signal from the ADAT receiver is also wired to the microcontroller, which drives the mute line when no ADAT signal or an invalid ADAT signal is present.  This prevents horrible noises from going to the outputs when the ADAT input is unplugged.  The D/A converters don’t have any kind of built-in muting feature, and have a tendency to produce very loud squealing noises if the clock inputs are invalid.  The automatic muting keeps that noise from going to my speakers.

The Rear Panel

back

The actual connectors are mounted on the back of the case on an aluminum plate.  The optical transmitter and receiver were salvaged from a lightning-damaged AudioBox 1818VSL (long story.)  There’s also an LED on the back panel that lights up when a valid ADAT bitstream is present on the input, and the USB port for controlling the gains.

The panel is waterjet-cut from 1/16″ aluminum and somewhat hastily spraypainted matte black.  A small PCB with the I/O connectors screws on with a pair of angle brackets.

io_solder

The optical transmitter and receiver are through-hole parts, so they end up on the other side of the single-sided copper board with the LED and brackets:

io_component

And then everything gets connected together with 6-pin ribbon cables, through a hole milled into the back of the box where the original DB-25 connector used to be:

plate_removed

Clocking

I wanted to be able to still use the wordclock input and output on the back of the box—wordclock is always useful to have in larger audio systems.  The clock recovered from the ADAT bitstream is also sometimes more jittery than desirable.  The ADAT receiver chip supports a wordclock input as well.

The clock configuration isn’t as cleanly done in this hack at this point, mainly because I didn’t have a digital mux in my parts bin that would have enabled the microcontroller to select the clock source.  Instead, the ADAT receiver can be switched between clock modes with the little slide switch on the side of the ADAT board, and the buffered signal from the BNC jack is enabled with this jumper on a header (also glued to the original PCB):

clock

So, currently, changing the clock source requires opening up the case.  I might at some point get around to adding that mux so it’s software selectable.

The wordclock output connector is always active, and will output whatever clock source the board is currently using.

Conclusion

In the end, it works great!  It ended up being a bit more work than I was expecting (especially discovering that the config pins on the converters were going to need to get lifted from the baord to change the data format) but it’s always nice to recycle something useless into something functional.  The entire hack took a couple days, starting with probing for the signals, adding the headers and soldering all of the jumper wires, making the PCBs, debugging, testing, and finally writing the software for the microcontroller (which I’m still tweaking a little bit.)

The converters are old—they are only 20 bits whereas most newer pro audio gear is 24-bit, but 20 bits is actually fine for most purposes.  The analog stuff is actually pretty well done, and I’m pleased with how it sounds.  I haven’t tried it for any serious recording work (yet), but the outputs are actually very satisfying on my monitors, which frees up my gamma 2 DAC for me to use elsewhere.

Lighting Control Boards

I designed these boards to be integrated into 12VDC track lighting fixtures with MR16 LED lamps in the Media Lab atrium.  They are based on the Atmel XMega A4 series (originally designed for the ATxmega32A4 and that’s what’s in the atrium lighting installation, but forwards-compatible with the A4U series chips; most of my current uses for this board use the ATxmega128A4U) and the AT86RF231 radio (though the RF230 and newer variants like the RF233 should also be usable.)

mr16board

The radio is pinned out to the SPI interface on port C, and 3 LEDs along the edge of the board are pinned out to port D.  Dimming the MR16 lamps is accomplished by PWM control of a low-side N-channel MOSFET, connected to a PWM output compare unit on port E.  All of the other GPIO pins are broken out to 100-mil headers on the board, which includes all of ports A, B, and E, and part of ports C and D.  22 total GPIO pins are broken out.

The left half of the board contains the power supply circuitry and the power MOSFET.  The bridge rectifier on the power input allows for the supply to be connected in either polarity, or to AC power.  A linear regulator cheaply (but inefficiently) drops the supply voltage to the 3.3V needed by the logic on the board.  If the power supply circuitry and MOSFET are not needed, the entire left half of the board may be cut off and 3.3V fed directly to the 100-mil headers.

The RF antenna can be attached via an SMA connector, but in low-cost applications a 25mm wire (quarter-wave antenna) works very well.

The removability of the power supply circuitry and the extensive I/O breakout make this board useful as a general-purpose Xmega wireless development board, and I’ve indeed reused it in several other wireless projects.

I have adapted my basic extension of Atmel’s 802.15.4 MAC/transceiver toolkit (which is now quite dated and contains unnecessary workarounds for AT86RF230 revision A silicon errata) to this board.  Most of my recent development, however, uses the Atmel Lightweight Mesh protocol, to which I’ve added HAL support for the A4 series chips and board support for this board.  (Hg repository: http://simonetti.media.mit.edu/hg/lwm).

MR16 Board Schematics are available.

Printing Functional Objects with the Form 1

3D-printed microphone clip

3D-printed microphone clip and custom-built microphone.  Please excuse the messy desk in the background.

The idea of starting with a digital model of a 3D object and having a physical representation in your hands a few hours later is certainly kind of magical.  I remember when my department at UW got its first 3D printer (which cost about as much as a nice car and was the size of a refrigerator) I spent hours staring through its window, watching it build up objects a layer at a time.  Amazingly, just a few years later, there are now several desktop-sized printers available at a fraction of the cost.  With the recent availability of these “personal” 3D printers, it’s been interesting to see the resulting models that people have printed.  I’ve yet to see one that doesn’t have a few chess pieces and an Eiffel Tower or two sitting next to it, showing off its capabilities.

While these intricate models are definitely cool, 3D printing isn’t just about models that look nice.  To me, the real value of 3D printing is being able to print out physical models that are functional, that wouldn’t otherwise be easy to obtain.  I’ve recently been working with the Form 1, which is a recent desktop-sized 3D printer capable of some pretty impressive prints.  While I’ve certainly printed a few things that are just for looking at, I’ve also been using it to make functional objects.  And so far, I’ve been pretty happy.

One of the models I’ve printed is a custom microphone clip (pictured above.)  I’ve recently gotten into building custom microphones (which I’ll write more about in a later article) starting with some that are fairly unique.  One of my current research projects involves audio recording and streaming at an outdoor site (you can listen in live, here).  I needed some microphones that were relatively inexpensive, sensitive enough to pick up quiet sounds, and wouldn’t get destroyed after months of being exposed to the elements.  I’ve arrived at the design you see above, which packs a nice electret microphone capsule and the circuitry for it into a weather-resistant XLR connector (what you’d normally find at the end of a microphone cable.)  They’ve been working great outdoors, where they are hanging from trees and tied to shrubs.

It turns out that they actually make great omnidirectional microphones for more traditional recording applications, too.  But few pianos that I’ve encountered have convenient overhanging tree branches to tie the microphones to.  So, they need to go on stands, and for that, I need microphone clips.  And these microphones are too small to work in most standard microphone clips.  And, if you go to buy microphone clips, you discover that clips are either sold for specific microphones (which are generally overpriced—I guess the manufacturers figure that if you’re spending $1000 on a microphone you’re willing to pay $40 for a piece of plastic that holds it) or they’re sold as “universal,” which basically means that it fits any microphone as long as it’s an SM-58.

mic_clip_sw

So, faced with either expensive clips that might or might not fit my microphones, or cheap universal ones that almost certainly would be too loose, I fired up my CAD software and sketched one out.  It’s two pieces—the base that screws onto the stand (including 3D printed threads—US microphone stands use really weird 5/8″-27 threads) and the clip that holds the microphone itself.  The two parts fasten together with a bolt & nut, which, when tightened down loosely, creates a friction hinge allowing the angle of the microphone to be adjusted.

mic_clip_form

Here’s the Form file.  I haven’t quite figured out how to do the supports for the base.  I’ve actually had best results printing the base without supports (it’s a little bit of a challenge to get it off of the build platform, but it keeps the surface finish on the outside nice.  I’d love to support it from the bottom, but the current PreForm software really wants to put supports inside that get just a little bit too close to the threads (one of my earlier prints has a support that fused into the threads.)

Overall, it turned out great!  For a few dollars in material, I have some perfectly functional mic clips, with working threads and everything.  (The threads did require some careful cleaning with tweezers after the print finished to remove a little bit of gunk.)  The material actually has just the right amount of flex in it that the microphone snaps in and out of the clip easily but stays put when it’s in the clip.  The pair I made worked great for recording inside of a piano!

This is the stuff that I think is really cool about desktop 3D printing.  In a couple of hours I was able to draw up and have in my hands an accessory that works perfectly with a device that I built—something that I really can’t just go on Amazon and buy.

The ZigBoard (working title)

3D PCBComputer rendering of prototype board. Created with Altium Designer 6.9; components modeled in SolidWorks 2009

Many small projects seem like they would benefit from low-power, low-bandwidth wireless connectivity. Commercial modules such as the excellent XBee series of devices exist, but are relatively large, expensive, and seem better suited to tinkering with the technology than integration into a finished project. Single-chip RF transceiver solutions are small and inexpensive, but require a fabricated PCB for every design. My goal with this project is to develop an inexpensive and small RF transceiver module that is flexible enough to use in the prototyping stages of a project while not being so general and large that it’s wasteful to use in a finished work.

Specifications

  • Communications Protocol: 802.15.4, provided by the AT86RF230 transceiver chip and MAC implemented in firmware
  • Microprocessor: ATmega168 or ATmega328 (same footprint, more memory)
  • Antenna: 2.4 GHz board antenna design from TI application note
  • Matching network: Integrated 2.4 GHz chip balun for Wi-Fi and Bluetooth applications
  • Interfaces: RS232 and I2C exposed at board edge, SPI exposed in programming connector
  • Additional I/O: 2 digital GPIO lines with PWM, 3 GPIO lines with analog inputs
  • Dimensions: 1.25″ by 0.6″

Key Design Goals

  • Low cost: $10-20 per board
  • Hand-assemblable (minimal component count, low component density, and oversized pads for the 0402 components)
  • Possible to integrate into an existing microcontroller-based system in addition to providing sufficient I/O and computing to drive external hardware, sensors, etc. (It’s basically a low-cost 8-bit wireless mote.)
  • Small size
  • Inexpensive board fabrication: 2 layers, 0.006″ minimum trace/spacing, 0.015″ minimum hole size
  • Can be paired with an FTDI TTL RS-232-to-serial module ($15) to provide a computer-to-802.15.4 interface.

Status

The boards are completed and functional, but I haven’t had a chance to properly document them here yet. For an example of the boards in use and firmware/software code, please refer to this project on my MAS 863.10 page.

Partially assembled prototype
Partially assembled prototype board.

An Electric Field Pretouch System for Grasping and Co-Manipulation

Pretouch is a sense that is longer range than touch, but shorter than vision. Using electric field sensing hardware that I designed to fit inside a robot’s fingers, several robotic manipulation tasks are made easier or possible.

Human-to-robot and robot-to-human handoff

In this work, the robot is programmed to accept an object from a human, and then hand it to another human.

  • First, the e-field pretouch sensors are used to detect the presence of an object that a human is holding up and track the object to center the robot’s hand on it as a human might be moving around.
  • Once the sensors detect that the object has stopped moving, the sensors are again used to servo the positions of the fingers to equal distances from the object’s surface, about a centimeter away. This ensures that when the fingers close, they will make simultaneous contact to avoid displacing the object.
  • After grasping the object, the robot waits for the human to let go before trying to move away. The human holding onto the object provides an AC path to ground, which the e-field sensors can detect. When the human lets go, this current path goes away and is easily observed in the sensor readings.
  • The robot moves its arm to hand the object to another human. Again, the e-field sensors are used to detect whether the human has accepted the object so that it does not let go prematurely.

Picking up stationary objects

We also demonstrated the use of the e-field pretouch sensors to pick up stationary objects from surfaces when only the approximate position of the object is known. Using closed-loop controllers, the sensor inputs are used to correct the positioning of the arm and fingers to facilitate reliable grasps.

Demonstrations

This technology has been featured in several high-profile demos, including:

  • CeBIT opening ceremony, Hannover, Germany March 2009
  • Intel Developer Forum, San Francisco, CA, September 2008
  • Intel Developer Forum, Taipei, Taiwan, October 2008

Videos


Grasping various objects with and without e-field pretouch sensing


E-field handoff demo at the CeBIT 2009 opening ceremony, with Intel Chairmain Craig Barrett, Governor Schwarzenegger, and Chancellor Merkel

Relevant Publications

Mayton, B., LeGrand, L., and Smith, J. 2009. An Electric Field Pretouch System for Grasping and Co-Manipulation. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2010.

 

Enabling Robots to Plug In to Unmodified Electrical Outlets

Using electric field sensing hardware that I designed, I enabled Marvin, Intel Labs Seattle’s mobile manipulation research platform, to plug itself in to ordinary, unmodified electrical outlets. The robot only needs to know the approximate location of an outlet on its 2D map to drive up to it and precisely align the prongs with the holes in the socket by sensing the emitted 60Hz electric field.

Relevant Publications
Mayton, B.D., Legrand, L., and Smith, J. 2009.  Robot, Feed Thyself: Plugging In to Unmodified Electrical Outlets by Sensing Emitted AC Electric FieldsIEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2010.

Media Coverage
Gizmodo: Intel Robot Finds Wall Socket, Plugs Self In
Seattle Times: Intel Robot’s New Trick

Weekend Project: The Message Box

Having a small character LCD hooked up to a computer isn’t really a novel idea. They became popular on servers, which often run without monitors attached, to convey vital system status information to technicians. In more recent years, they have become popular in custom-built PCs. I wanted one on my desk because there are often small notifications that I want to be accessible at all times, but not the center of my attention. On-screen notifications, such as icons in the GNOME panel, the Windows system tray, or Growl on Mac OS X work fairly well, but only if I’m sitting at my computer and have the monitors turned on. An external notification device is able to convey this information without a large display.

I could have purchased a pre-built unit; they exist both as displays that fit into an empty expansion bay on the front of a PC, or separate desktop units. However, my aesthetics don’t always match up with the PC-modding community (I tend to prefer things simple and understated rather than bright and flashy; I don’t want my PC to look like the typical “gaming rig”).

Building things yourself is great because you get to decide exactly how it’s going to look and work. I also chose to add 3 RGB LEDs to the device—many small bits of information are binary, such as having a new e-mail message. The LEDs provide a great way to convey information like this, and they’re meaningful from across the room. Using RGB LEDs makes them customizable, or allows information to be encoded in the color of the indicators.

The message box.
The completed message box.

Specifications

  • Enclosure: Recycled Apple power adapter packaging
  • LCD: 2 line by 16 character display, using the ubiquitous HD44780 controller
  • Microcontroller: ATmega168, using the internal RC oscillator
  • Interface: USB, using the FT232R chip for USB-to-serial
  • LEDs: 3 RGB T1-3/4 LEDs

Construction

Rather than designing a custom PCB and fabricating a custom enclosure, I decided that I’d put together the Message Box as a true weekend project, using only materials I had around in the parts bin. The enclosure that I chose is the plastic box that Apple uses to package their chargers for the iPhone/iPod touch. It was perfect for re-use in a project like this.
Plastic box.
The Apple plastic box.

I started by cutting a piece of perfboard to fit the inside of the box. I drilled four holes in the corners of the board and the box so that the board could be mounted on standoffs. I soldered a USB mini-B jack to the edge of the board, then drilled and filed out an opening for it in the plastic.

After confirming the fit of the board in the box, I placed all of the large components on the board: the LCD, the ATmega168, and the 3 LEDs. I checked the fit in the box and then soldered them down.

The FTDI chip that I used to provide the USB interface is only available in surface-mount form. There’s a nice evaluation board with the chip and a USB port on it that I’ve used before in other projects, but I didn’t have any sitting around. The prefabricated evaluation board also adds about $20 to a project, where the chip itself and a USB connector can be sourced for a couple of bucks.

To use the surface mount chip, I placed a piece of Kapton tape on the bottom of the perfboard to keep the pads from shorting out the pins on the chip, and epoxied the chip to the tape. The whole board is wired point-to-point using 30-gauge wire. Soldering the wire directly to the pins of the chip takes a reasonably fine iron tip and a little bit of practice, but it’s really not bad once you get the hang of it.

USB interface.
The USB jack and FTDI chip.

I then proceeded to wire up the rest of the board. For the passive components, I used 0603-size surface mount resistors and capacitors. These are actually great for point-to-point work like this, because they fit perfectly between pins with the standard 100-mil through-hole spacing. The bypass capacitors fit neatly between the power and ground pins on the chips, and the LED resistors take up hardly any space at all. You just need a good pair of tweezers for placing them accurately.

Wiring.
Point-to-point wiring on the back side of the board.

Firmware and Software

I wrote the firmware for the device in C, using the avr-gcc toolchain. There is a 6-pin ISP socket on the back of the board to enable the microcontroller to be programmed.

The device appears under Linux as a standard USB serial port (/dev/ttyUSB0). I set up the protocol so that any text written to the port appears on the display. I also implemented a very limited subset of the VT100 terminal command set for operations such as clearing the display and positioning the cursor. To control the LEDs, I added a few custom escape sequences.

On the PC end, I wrote a Python script that updates the information on the display. It periodically polls a variety of sources such as RSS feeds, e-mail inbox message counts, instant message clients, and music players, and then updates the text on the LCD and the state of the LEDs accordingly.

Conclusion

The Message Box is a great little device; I’m glad I spent the time building it. I’m still tweaking the code to make it do different things and customize the functionality, but that’s what’s great about having a custom-built solution—in the end, it will do exactly what I want it to do.

Robot Power System

In order to construct Intel Labs Seattle’s mobile robotics platform, MARVIN, I needed to build a power system to supply the DC voltages required by the different components of the system. I used nickel-metal hydride battery packs as the battery power source and VICOR DC-DC converters to provide the various required voltages. The control panel on the rear of the robot is laser-cut acrylic and provides control over battery power, battery chargers, power to individual system components, and battery current and voltage monitoring.

One of the important features of the design is an onboard AC to DC power supply. This allows the robot to run indefinitely from a single tether, which plugs into a standard electrical outlet; no external power supply is needed. The system switches seamlessly between wall and battery power when wall power is connected or disconnected, so no part of the system needs to be shut down to connect or disconnect power. Onboard chargers enable the robot to recharge its batteries while it is plugged in.

Control panel
MARVIN’s rear control panel.  Power module controls are at the bottom.

Specifications

  • Batteries: 2 13000mAh 24V Ni-MH packs in series, for 48V system power
  • DC voltage rails: 48/56V (unregulated), 24V 500W, 12V 500W, 5V 100W
  • Chargers: 2 onboard 1A Ni-MH chargers
  • Wall power supply: 110/220VAC input 56V output 1600W DC power supply, with automatic switchover
  • System runtime: 2-3 hours under normal load (arm and hand in motion, laser rangefinder and two PCs running)
  • Monitoring: Battery current and voltage meters on the back panel; soon to have computer monitoring of system voltages and currents via this board

Power module internalsInside the power module while I was constructing it. DC-DC converters and solid state relay are mounted on an aluminum side panel for heatsinking. Fuses, relays for the switching/interlock logic, and screw terminals for easy connection of peripherals are mounted on the bottom plate. Batteries will fill most of the empty space.

Classroom Presenter for the XO Laptop

UW Classroom Presenter, developed by Richard Anderson et al. at the University of Washington, is interactive presentation software that runs on tablet PCs. Each student uses his or her own tablet PC, can see written annotations made on the slide by the instructor (called “ink”) and can add his or her own ink to slides which can be submitted back to the instructor to be reviewed or shared with the class. In my undergraduate capstone project at the University of Washington, I worked with several other students to develop a version of Classroom Presenter that runs on the One Laptop Per Child foundation’s XO laptop.

The software is not just a port but a complete adaptation to make it usable on the XO. The XO is not a tablet, so only simple drawing with the trackpad (or a mouse) is possible. We added text input features to enable students to provide a textual response to a question without needing to write it with a mouse. We use the XO’s built-in facilities for discovering shared activities and connecting to other machines, so that connecting the machines together is simple enough for elementary students to do themselves. We also included features necessary for setups that don’t include a projector: the original UW Classroom Presenter expects that if the teacher wants to share a student’s submission with the class, he or she will use a projector to display it. In our implementation, we enable the teacher to broadcast selected student submissions to the rest of the class, so students may view them on their own screens.

The project culminated in a trial at a local elementary school, where students in small groups shared XO laptops to complete activities about a recent field trip, while the teacher talked about the students’ work and shared their submissions with the rest of the class.

Screenshot with student ink
Screenshot of a slide in Classroom Presenter for the XO with student responses

Students using Classroom Presenter for the XO
Students using Classroom Presenter on the XO during our classroom trial.
Photo: Mark Ahlness / CC BY-NC-ND 2.0

Links

Conclusions

The results of the trial were very positive; we received great feedback both from the teacher and from his students. The source code we developed has been made available under an open source license.